Proximodo CPU Efficency
|
Nov. 28, 2004, 11:04 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
Try this:
\1=$AV(\1)&&\1=$AV(\1zzz\1) Pretty useless as is, but I used this pattern to tune \1 and $AV for performance. Result: Proximodo scans pages for than pattern more than twice faster than Proxomitron! What I mean is, it takes some effort to reach performance, but it works. I did it on certain pieces of code, I didn't yet on much of it, but I will. I am glad Proximodo is no slower than reasonable in its first version Believe me, first versions of Proxomitron were WAYYYY slower than 4.5 Naoko, and that's normal: good development process is 1. write clean code 2. optimize it (only were it needs it) "Premature optimization is the root of all evil" -- Car Hoare Btw, give a try to 0.2, I didn't optimize it further yet but I removed bugs that could have explained the CPU consumption. If you still have that kind of speed pb, try determining which of your filters slows down the most and I'll do some speed tuning based on it. Kuruden |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[] - Guest - Nov. 28, 2004, 07:22 AM
[] - kuruden - Nov. 28, 2004 11:04 AM
|