|
Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change.
|
|
Dec. 31, 2010, 07:54 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change.
(Dec. 30, 2010 06:22 PM)Graycode Wrote: Well the particular IBM server in question uses RFC1950 but with a 4K compression window instead of the more common 32K window. Its first 2 bytes come out 0x48 and 0xC7, so "These aren't the droids you're looking for" and Proxo's decompression failed. I did find other deflate (RFC1950 and RFC1951) streams that the Proxomitron could handle and reached a similar conclusion after comparing all the streams in wireshark. Thanks for the details. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 28, 2010, 07:46 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - whenever - Dec. 29, 2010, 03:36 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 29, 2010, 05:21 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - whenever - Dec. 30, 2010, 08:31 AM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 30, 2010, 03:15 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - Graycode - Dec. 30, 2010, 06:22 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 31, 2010 07:54 PM
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help





![[-]](images/ONi/collapse.gif)