|
Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change.
|
|
Dec. 29, 2010, 05:21 PM
(This post was last modified: Dec. 29, 2010 05:42 PM by JJoe.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change.
(Dec. 29, 2010 03:36 PM)whenever Wrote: 1. Empty Accept-Encoding is permitted. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.3 The empty header could be sent when the User-Agent wasn't sending an empty header. Doesn't seem like the thing to do? (Dec. 29, 2010 03:36 PM)whenever Wrote: 2. The filter changes I forgot about that one. I'll plug the hole, thanks. (Dec. 29, 2010 03:36 PM)whenever Wrote: 3. Why not remove x-gzip? Lack of knowledge. I thought about that. Also considered changing x-gzip to gzip when gzip is not present. However, Opera still sends x-gzip and I found an app that added support years after its creators considered x-gzip to be deprecated. Why? Am also considering forcing gzip only when deflate and gzip are present and or throwing a flag for deflate compressed files. The new filter allows the user to do as they wish. Question is what should the default be? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 28, 2010, 07:46 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - whenever - Dec. 29, 2010, 03:36 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 29, 2010 05:21 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - whenever - Dec. 30, 2010, 08:31 AM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 30, 2010, 03:15 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - Graycode - Dec. 30, 2010, 06:22 PM
RE: Proposed Accept-Encoding header filter change. - JJoe - Dec. 31, 2010, 07:54 PM
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help





![[-]](images/ONi/collapse.gif)