Post Reply 
Iron (Chrome/Chromium) has problems with Sidki filters
Oct. 06, 2010, 03:15 PM
Post: #23
RE: Iron (Chrome/Chromium) has problems with Sidki filters
(Oct. 06, 2010 01:21 PM)Mele20 Wrote:  The user agent string in Proxo accomplishes...

Well, yes and no. Yes, The strings may be unique to us. No, Sites may not need the strings or use the entire strings to identify us.

I think 'hiding' is more complicated than it looks.

Regardless, it is your choice to send what you want. No set can please everybody or should be expected to.


http://prxbx.com/forums/showthread.php?t...1#pid13201
(Jul. 25, 2009 11:01 AM)sidki3003 Wrote:  
Quote:BTW, what's the point to "correct" browser's Use-Agent?

Generally: No need to give away more browser information than required for proper page display.

Firefox: Sort of a permanent test if UA string changes are still working.
And - for me - to get a clue about config usage in access logs.
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Iron (Chrome/Chromium) has problems with Sidki filters - JJoe - Oct. 06, 2010 03:15 PM

Forum Jump: