|
XUProxy status update
|
|
Oct. 19, 2009, 07:58 PM
(This post was last modified: Oct. 19, 2009 08:01 PM by andrew_w.)
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: XUProxy status update
(Oct. 19, 2009 02:00 PM)defconnect Wrote: Should be very interesting to see if it processes the filtering rules faster than Proxo self! At the moment, the content and header filters are slower than the Proxomitron, even with the C version of the filters enabled (most of XUProxy is written in Python, but there are optional C versions of parts of the matching/filtering modules). I think that it's partially because the C matching code still does a lot of Python attribute accesses. I'll try to optimize it further in the version after 0.1.0. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Oct. 17, 2009, 12:49 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - whenever - Oct. 18, 2009, 03:14 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - aqua - Oct. 18, 2009, 11:51 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - lnminente - Oct. 19, 2009, 09:34 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - defconnect - Oct. 19, 2009, 02:00 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Oct. 19, 2009 07:58 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - defconnect - Oct. 19, 2009, 08:41 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - Siamesecat - Oct. 20, 2009, 05:55 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Oct. 21, 2009, 11:55 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - whenever - Oct. 22, 2009, 09:15 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - maxbaggi - Oct. 29, 2009, 04:46 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Jan. 03, 2010, 02:30 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Jul. 06, 2010, 06:06 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - defconnect - Jul. 08, 2010, 02:10 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - lnminente - Jul. 10, 2010, 09:50 AM
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help


Support for 64-bit and IPv6 remains another story, also with regards to this thread: <a href="http://prxbx.com/forums/showthread.php">http://prxbx.com/forums/showthread.php</a>?tid=1446

![[-]](images/ONi/collapse.gif)