|
XUProxy status update
|
|
Oct. 19, 2009, 02:00 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: XUProxy status update
Should be very interesting to see if it processes the filtering rules faster than Proxo self!
At any rate, very happy that the immediate future of Proxo is secured by the successful tests on Windows-7 32-bits. Support for 64-bit and IPv6 remains another story, also with regards to this thread: http://prxbx.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=1446
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Oct. 17, 2009, 12:49 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - whenever - Oct. 18, 2009, 03:14 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - aqua - Oct. 18, 2009, 11:51 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - lnminente - Oct. 19, 2009, 09:34 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - defconnect - Oct. 19, 2009 02:00 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Oct. 19, 2009, 07:58 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - defconnect - Oct. 19, 2009, 08:41 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - Siamesecat - Oct. 20, 2009, 05:55 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Oct. 21, 2009, 11:55 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - whenever - Oct. 22, 2009, 09:15 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - maxbaggi - Oct. 29, 2009, 04:46 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Jan. 03, 2010, 02:30 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - andrew_w - Jul. 06, 2010, 06:06 AM
RE: XUProxy status update - defconnect - Jul. 08, 2010, 02:10 PM
RE: XUProxy status update - lnminente - Jul. 10, 2010, 09:50 AM
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help


Support for 64-bit and IPv6 remains another story, also with regards to this thread: 

![[-]](images/ONi/collapse.gif)