Is AdBlock Plus needed to filter everything Proxo misses?

[leecovuk]

This is off the specific topic here, but don't we feel that blocking every ad is bad for the net, because many sites need ad revenue to survive and expand?
I mean, regardless of whether or not we buy something we see on an ad, don't sites often benefit financially by a site visitor simply clicking on a page and being presented with the ad? I suppose I'm talking about 'click-through' revenue, if such a thing does actually exist beyond in my mind.

If that is the case, how specifically can we setup Prox+Sidki to achieve such a balance between viewing most ads but still avoiding most tracking/profiling? (Probably still blocking overly invasive ads such as popups and popunders, Flash ads that jump out at you on mouseover, etc)
I do appreciate however that a certain amount of those two sides may not be seperable.
I already have a rough idea of how I think I/we could set up Sidki + Prox in such a way from asking something similar a year or so ago, but I'd like to check to be sure of the most preferable filter combination currently.

Thanks,
Lee

PS On this actual topic;
As I said a few months ago, I have Adblock Plus in circuit without a list enabled in it. I just use it to block the odd ad on the odd site because I find it easier to use than Prox. Currently however, I think I only have 2 specific entries in use.
I use a similar principle with NoScript, in that I keep it in circuit but 'allowing all' with the odd specific exception. Again, not many; only one currently I think, which I could actually do fairly similarly and easily with Prox.