Post Reply 
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/
Jan. 21, 2009, 05:09 PM
Post: #3
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/
It seems to be cookie-controlled interstitial code, hiding "body *":
Code:
<style type="text/css" id="interstitialcss912707">
    body div.interstitial, body div.interstitial iframe
    {
        display:block !important;
    }
    body *
    {
        display:none;
    }
    body div.interstitial, body div.interstitial iframe
    {
        display:block !important;
    }
</style>

...followed by a blocked ad script, that turns body display on again:
Code:
var styleNode = document.getElementById('interstitialcss' + adId);
styleNode.parentNode.removeChild(styleNode);


Maybe it's worth a shot to do just the same as above script by having the site-specific container killer also look for style tags:
-> attachment

And then replace the old AdKeys-S entry:
Code:
[^.]+.cnn.com/            $SET(sAdKey=.cnnCeilAd.cnnContextualLinks
  .cnnNavAd.cnnSCRightColumn.contextualLinks.MagOF.)

...with:
Code:
[^.]+.cnn.com/            $SET(sAdKey=.cnnRR336ad.interstitial.MagOF.)


Some other things have changed as well as CNN, so i've replaced the old IncludeExclude entry:
Code:
## CNN
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[^.]+.cnn.com/video/    $SET(0=a_adscr.a_jslink.i_timer:0.)
i.l.cnn.net/cnn/video/    $SET(0=a_flash.a_adfn2.)

...with
Code:
## CNN
## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[^.]+.cnn.com/(video/$SET(0=i_timer:0.)|$SET(1=ban_1:0.))
i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/*/video/    $SET(0=a_flash.a_adfn1.a_adfn2.)


Attached File(s)
.txt  spec-containers-test.txt (Size: 1.84 KB / Downloads: 811)
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - DarthTrader - Jan. 21, 2009, 05:57 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - sidki3003 - Jan. 21, 2009, 01:16 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - sidki3003 - Jan. 21, 2009 05:09 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - JJoe - Aug. 25, 2010, 05:24 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - DarthTrader - Jan. 21, 2009, 06:03 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Aug. 21, 2010, 12:46 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - DarthTrader - Aug. 21, 2010, 10:36 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - sidki3003 - Aug. 22, 2010, 10:22 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Aug. 25, 2010, 03:17 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - sidki3003 - Aug. 25, 2010, 03:33 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Aug. 26, 2010, 05:17 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - JJoe - Aug. 26, 2010, 02:03 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Aug. 27, 2010, 12:45 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Oct. 24, 2010, 02:17 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - JJoe - Oct. 24, 2010, 04:57 AM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Oct. 24, 2010, 03:59 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Oct. 24, 2010, 04:45 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - JJoe - Oct. 24, 2010, 06:12 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Oct. 24, 2010, 08:52 PM
RE: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/ - wammie - Oct. 24, 2010, 09:01 PM

Forum Jump: