Post Reply 
Speaking of YouTube.......
Nov. 18, 2008, 08:37 PM
Post: #31
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
PR;
(Nov. 17, 2008 12:11 PM)ProxRocks Wrote:  
(Nov. 17, 2008 07:39 AM)Oddysey Wrote:  when using the so-called Google High(t) Quality filter, currently under discussion in another thread.
yeah, as an administrator, how 'bout removing that typo-T for us in said other thread, lol...
Sadly, no, I can't rename a thread (nor even a forum). I'll scramble Kye-u on this one, and see if he can help a brother out.


Oddysey

I'm no longer in the rat race - the rats won't have me!
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 18, 2008, 09:03 PM
Post: #32
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
ha ha, my CC-powers are higher than your prxbx-powers, lol...
(just messin' with ya...)
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 19, 2008, 03:26 AM
Post: #33
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
I ran across a rather large (4383 bytes) flash embed here:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washingt...ain-2.html

It blew right past my toggle filter due to the byte limit.
Of course, it tries to connect to doubleclick right away.

Anyway, I increased the byte limit to 5120.
I'm not sure how big it would be if it was coded as an object.

z12
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 19, 2008, 11:24 AM
Post: #34
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
many thanks for the update...
(oh, and i updated above [Post #3] also...)
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 04:56 AM
Post: #35
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
(Nov. 16, 2008 03:52 PM)ProxRocks Wrote:  here it is (it looks more complex than it is, bear with me, i'm all but convinced that this is a MUST-HAVE and will break the 'install' down step-by-step)...
ProxRocks, what's the point of using this instead of sidki's original toggle flash filter?
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 12:38 PM
Post: #36
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
sidki's original toggle filter, albeit effective in toggling, does NOT prevent the CONNECTION...

go to a page with flash on it, do NOT toggle ANY of the flash "on"...
open your "what the Proxo is thinking" page...
you will note that not only was the CONNECTION established, but the ENTIRE .swf, every single MEGABYTE, has been downloaded...

so, what's the purpose in toggling if you didn't save any bandwidth, if you pinged the site hosting the flashie gyration?

when i "block" something (ie, toggle off and don't manually toggle it on), i don't want the hosting site pinged and i'm toggling to save bandwidth...
granted, the latter is less important these days, but still "important" to me Big Teeth
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 12:57 PM
Post: #37
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
I just made a test. No swf was downloaded before I toggle any flash. Whistling
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 01:03 PM
Post: #38
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
For me, the reason of toggling is not wasting space in my screen. If i can prevent the download double better.
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 02:07 PM
Post: #39
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
(Nov. 29, 2008 12:57 PM)whenever Wrote:  I just made a test. No swf was downloaded before I toggle any flash. Whistling

you only tested one browser, not all of the "Big SIX" (IE, Firefox, Opera, GreenBrowser, Maxthon, Sleipnir)... :P
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 02:43 PM
Post: #40
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
You are right.

Opera and Firefox won't but IE7 and GreenBrowser will download some flash before I toggle any flash. I didn't test Maxthon and Sleipnir but suppose they will behave the same because they use the same IE core.

Fortunately Opera is my major browser now and Firefox is the backup. Greenbrowser is the third and I seldom use it.
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 03:05 PM
Post: #41
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
GreenBrowser -> Opera -> Sleipnir -> Maxthon -> Firefox ... in that order for me... i *never* use IE, just "shells"...

Opera "would" be my default *IF* hotkey shortcuts worked when NO TAB is in the tab-bar...

we all have our "preferences" and our own "justifications", lol...
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Nov. 29, 2008, 03:54 PM
Post: #42
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
I used Maxthon many years ago, it was a very good browser, but my reason to change to firefox in these times was to avoid downloading of toggled swf's before unhiding. Nowadays, firefox downloads hided divs and iframes... (not swf's). Is supposedly used by programmers to accelerate the load of images you maybe see later... :/

A nice browser IE based is also TheWorld http://www.ioage.com/en/product.htm

BTW doesn't seems the browser from google to have many success ...
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Jan. 16, 2009, 06:39 PM
Post: #43
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
A small hijack:
FYI, Do you remember the tip of Graycode to create a folder with the name of the file to prevent its creation?
I saw a security tip for our pen drives, many virus tend to create a autorun.inf to autoexecute theirselfs when we plug the pen drive. We can disable autorun in our computers anyway, but it's safer to create a folder called autorun.inf for pluging them in other computers Wink
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Jan. 18, 2009, 06:48 AM
Post: #44
RE: Speaking of YouTube.......
One thing about Firefox is that there is a great extension for it called "Flashblock" which stops Flash items from loading, yet allows loading any item that you choose to load. All you need to do is click an icon over the space where the item would be.
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: