JakxPack IV download

[sidki3003]

Hey redskin_one - disregarding your request - but i would hate to see another Prox oldtimer go away.
Frankly, i wouldn't take such comments too seriously.
So i hope to see you around, some time, here or elsewhere.

sidki

PS: Duped post deleted.

[ProxRocks]

Not sure I'd say we've lost Jak... (at least, I certainly hope not)
He seems to show up, make a major contribution, then not show up for a couple of months - doing so with his next major contribution...

[Shea]

I don't know what Jak does while he's not on the board, but it always seems to be something big. I've noticed he doesn't really make these little posts like the last couple. He only posts when he has something to say. I don't think we've lost him.

Back on subject.....About the batch file, I'm thinking of changing it to a VBSCript file instead. That way I can have an option to keep a log of what everything was set to when you visited the site. It would merge all the lists located in C:\Jak_Session_Only_list. Would you guys find that useful or not?

[sidki3003]

buqingzi Wrote:Hey sidki since you are here, (and it seems we've lost Jak ) what do you think about the idea of adding the phrase LOGFILE to the Session_ lists? It's been implemented on my .bat (well not mine but Shea's) and I can't say I've noticed anything different. Also, do you think it would make the pack better if the temporary lists are kept in memory? I would try it out except it's not within my ability to implement the change...
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

When using "Logfile" the list isn't scanned for matches anymore. It doesn't break the set because the session-only lists are just there to keep the spoofing data constant per site - which is defunct with that keyword.

As to converting the session-only lists to temporary ones, this is Jak's thread and his filters are running just fine as they are. However, i'll post a small update pack with my version in another thread some time later. You can then see if memory lists work better for you or not.

Changing to memory lists yourself is really easy. Just stop overwriting the lists with the batch file for, say a week, and watch if they aren't growing too fast, otherwise they might occupy too much of your memory.
Then remove the respective entries under "[Blocklists]" in your config - et voila.


As to Jak, i'm pretty sure he won't stop messing with Prox.
I just hope, it's nothing serious that prevents him from coming here.
OTOH it wasn't *that* easy to keep track where this forum moved to again. [blink]


Shea:
What's the matter? Some of your recent comments sound like you'd like to educate people here how to handle their posts and what is worth saying and what not. While this is sure okay in some situations, this isn't one of them. People aren't necessarily newbies just because you don't know them.


sidki

[JakBeNymble]

Hi "Guyz",
Just wanted to login and let everyone know that I was still "alive"(well almost), . .*LOL*, . . .and that I've been working on another idea with Proxo (when I can find time), . . .I haven't made much progress, but I hope to be back later and tell You about it. What I hope is that we all can work together and maybe come up with a solution to some of the "snags" I've run into.

As I've always said, " All of us together is a whole lot better than any one of us alone". And don't worry if You don't hear from me for awhile, I'll alway be around and near wherever the "PROXOMITRON CLAN" gathers together at.

Best Wishes,
"Jak" =:-)

[JakBeNymble]

Here is what I've been trying to work on, . . .To get PRoxo to send a "spoofed" IP header when Your Ports are scanned. That would "close" the circle so to speak. I have run into the following problem. How to make Proxo "sense" the scan? I've tried to point Proxo to the fire-wall module that detects the port scan & I've tried a few other things, but so far I haven't been able to make it pick up the port scan. I'm not sure that this can be done, but I would surely apprecaite any and all information. I know that Proxo only runs on Port 80 and maybe one other. So it would depend on what Port the scan was made, but still if we could put our heads together on this and work out some solution, it would greatly improve the privacy aspect.

Thankx in advance,
Best Wishes,
"JaK" [smoke]

[Siamesecat]

Quote: Here is what I've been trying to work on, . . .To get PRoxo to send a "spoofed" IP header when Your Ports are scanned. That would "close" the circle so to speak. I have run into the following problem. How to make Proxo "sense" the scan?

If the firewall is set to ignore port scans, Prox would never see them.

[Oddysey]

Jak,

Keen idea, but consider this: Scott told us all often enough that Proxo won't filter email because that service uses another pair of ports (25/110), and Proxo only deals with Port 80 (and 443, the allegedly secure HTTP port).

If Scott designed, built, hardwired, and published Proxo to only deal with these two ports, then I'm afraid that you're in for a heap o' trouble, tryin' to make it do something that it physically can't do. :o

But never say never, 'specially to a Jak! <_< [lol] I'm waiting to see how you pull this one off, believe you me. :P


Oddysey

[JakBeNymble]

Here are a couple of options if We could get Proxo to detect the scan,
(1). Send a "Spoofed IP"
(2). Kill the Connection
(3). Use a Redirector filter and reroute the scan to an "Anonymous Remote Proxy". <-----[This is My favorite]

Take Care,
Best Wishes,
~JaK~

[JakBeNymble]

Hi "Guyz",
I thought I would post the autoexe.batch file for this last version of JakxPack(it only works for Win98x), but You can edit it to make it work for Xp. It cleans cookies, and dat files, and a couple of other things for IE & Netscape.

Quote:@ECHO OFF
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-ClientIP.txt
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-CountryCodes.txt
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-JakxAgents.txt
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-Jakx-Fake-Proxy.txt
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-ServerSoft.txt
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-Via.txt
DEL C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-X-Forwarded-For.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-ClientIP.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-CountryCodes.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-JakxAgents.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-Jakx-Fake-Proxy.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-ServerSoft.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-Via.txt
ECHO. >> C:\Jakx_Session_Only_list\Session-X-Forwarded-For.txt
deltree /y c:\windows\temp
mkdir c:\windows\temp
deltree /y c:\windows\cookies
deltree /y c:\windows\history
deltree /y c:\windows\tempor~1
deltree /y c:\windows\recent
deltree /y c:\temp
deltree /y c:\windows\applog
erase c:\windows\desktop\*.tmp
erase c:\windows\win386.swp
deltree /y c:\progra~1\netscape\users\default\cache
erase c:\progra~1\netscape\users\default\cookies.txt
erase c:\progra~1\netscape\users\default\netscape.hst
erase c:\progra~1\netscape\users\default\*.dat
erase c:\progra~1\netscape\users\default\*.db
erase C:\WINDOWS\Applic~1\Phoenix\Profiles\default\mu15hj60.slt\*.txt
erase C:\WINDOWS\Applic~1\Phoenix\Profiles\default\mu15hj60.slt\*.dat
cls
exit

Also check Your X-Forward-for list. Make sure that there is an entry at item # 167, and make sure the list contains 170 instead of two 160 entries. I've been working on my lists for the next version so I may have made these changes while working on them. But just check to make sure that Your X-Forwarded-For List is ok.

Thankx,
"Jak" =:-)

[ProxRocks]

Seems my X-Forwarded-For is outdated...
Do you have the latest version to upload, please?

[JakBeNymble]

Hi "ProxRocks",
I've just downloaded the full pack from the "Downloads" section of the forum. I check the X-Forwarded-For list and there was the "glitch" in the list. So everyone that's using JakxPack IV needs to check their list and make the corrections. Also, the names of the Packx are mixed up, the JakxPack IV is listed as JakxPack III, . . . .here is the link for the download. JakxPack IV
Please keep Me posted, . . .
Catch You Later,
"Jak" =:-)

[JakBeNymble]

Hi "Guyz",
As You know I've been working on having "Proxo" redirect the connections through a Remote Proxy when My Ports where being "scanned". I've got a filter in the works but nothing I want to post at this time, . . however,
I've found a program that "fakes" out the one site that JakxPack couldn't fool! It's an Intrusion Detection System. Without running this "proggie" the site "nails My Hide" everytime and says, . . .
Stealth Test ...
You DO NOT Appear To Be Stealthed Or On An ANONYMOUS Proxy!

This Could Be Bad!
Here is the the link Click here to begin the test

Now here is what it says when I run this little "proggie", . .
Stealth Test ...
A Proxy Server Was Detected!

This Could Be Good! But I'm only using JakxPack and this proggie.

The name of the program is "Attacker" it can be set to run at start-up, it "blinks" in the systray and it has a built in alarm, both can be disabled. You can also add/delete the ports You want it to monitor.
Here is where You can read about it and/or download it.
Click here

I've only tried it out on this "box" and I'm running win98x on it,
Best Wishes,
"Jak" [smoke]

Here is proggie if You want to download it here. It's only 28k but remember to scan it before You open it. Also, I put it in My "Trusted Apps" in My Outpost Firewall.

[elshaddai]

I'm getting........ Stealth Test ...
A Proxy Server Was Detected! just with Proxo and jak IV.

[JakBeNymble]

Hi "elshaddai",
Thankx for the feed-back. It could be where I have a dial-up connection. Most ISP's have a cache proxy or if You have a broad-band connection most of the time they have a Proxy-Firewall for those customers that have a static IP. I've never been able to fool that site. It's always "probes" or scans Port 80 & 8080 for Proxy activity. But if You have a dial-up connection, what type of "Fire-wall" are You using?

I ran into this little "proggie" looking for an "inter-face" for "PRoxo". And I discovered that this little "guy", . .not only logs, but "blocks" many ports during a port scan. There are many such types of IDS(Intrusion Detection System) programs on that link I gave, . .I chose this one because it was very light and from the info it sounded just like what I was looking for. Proxo only deals with Port 80 & 445 so I thought since this little "feller" logs the scan I might could point "Proxo" to it and that serve as a "trigger" for the "Redirector Filter" I was working on. I was very pleased to find out the results of running it.
Still working on that redirector filter, . . It works somewhat like I want it to, but it's far from was I'm looking for.
Thankx again for Your help and input, .
Have a Great & Wonderful After-noon,
"Jak" =:-)