![]() |
|
Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - Printable Version +- The Un-Official Proxomitron Forum (https://www.prxbx.com/forums) +-- Forum: Proxomitron Config Sets (/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +--- Forum: Sidki (/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +--- Thread: Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 (/showthread.php?tid=1884) |
Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - ProxRocks - Feb. 15, 2012 01:58 PM JJoe, regarding the Google Search Alternate Display filter dated "11.12.13" (copied below), do you have any documented cases of the "interstitial" portion ever matching? Code: Name = "Google Search: Alternate Display 11.12.13 (multi) [sd ku] (d.s)"RE: Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - JJoe - Feb. 15, 2012 03:59 PM (Feb. 15, 2012 01:58 PM)ProxRocks Wrote: do you have any documented cases of the "interstitial" portion ever matching? I don't think so but this doesn't mean it isn't out there somewhere. ![]() Google's code base is huge. I didn't see any in sidki's notes, yet. I rarely document such things. RE: Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - ProxRocks - Feb. 15, 2012 06:37 PM ah... mmm, i've been trying to "narrow down" my own Google filters... i guess i can always just as easily add it back in if i find it in the wild later on... there just seems to be some code in the Alt Dis filter that was placed there YEARS ago but that i've not seen match anything for well over a year... i guess i'd rather remove filter code that hasn't matched in YEARS as opposed to keeping it assuming the justification for it is "still out there", lol... RE: Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - sbk - Feb. 17, 2012 08:57 AM isn't it possible add an alert ../help/Matching%20Commands.html#ALERT ? or add an ../help/Matching Commands.html#ADDLST to that part of the match? then check the ADDLST file after a month ![]() semi-threadjack warning.. :-) A while ago, I was trying to fix bad styles on a horribly stubborn webpage. i noticed an inline !important in the page. So I made a simple filter to erase the idiot's !important I first wrote an ALERT into this: Code: Name = "CleanImportantCss[Sbk20111217T1a4"I could have edited the filter to create a ADDLST log, but I don't think there's somewhere to send the (long) output. PS. the filter's a bit loose, since it doesn't check if !important is inside style brackets or double quotes. I think a better filter would follow something like: Code: <style*>or if checking for inline: Code: <[^ ]+\s*++style\=\"*++([a-z -]+\:[^!]+)\1 ! important[^"]+\"*>but I dreaded hours of debugging.. ![]() someday I'll be reading a webpage discussing !important, and the sample code won't make sense. And maybe I'll send an email (no, don't!) to the website stating such. Oops.
RE: Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - ProxRocks - Feb. 17, 2012 11:56 AM lol... i bumped into one of those "!important" codes over the years also, don't remember where... it was a site i'd likely never ever land on again anyway, so i didn't write a filter for it at the time... i do remember specifically that the web designer was "forcing" links to be UNDERLINED - i personally HATE underlined links! a page full of "underlines" is an eyesore, in my humble opinion... (edit: and web browsers have the USER-OPTION of to-underline or not-to-underline FOR A REASON, lol... coding "around" that is indeed IDIOTIC...) actually, truth be told, i "reverse" link styling on this very forum, though i don't classify the underlines herein as an "eyesore" (because they all line up evenly with a border, not randomly placed chaotically throughout an article i'm reading or whatnot which instigated the creation of the filter)... Code: Name = "Header Top Inject: User CSS - Reverse Link Text-Decoration on sel. Sites [add]"RE: Google Alt Disp - prox-config-sidki_2011-12-22rc1 - JJoe - Feb. 18, 2012 12:45 AM (Feb. 17, 2012 08:57 AM)sbk Wrote: then check the ADDLST file after a month These days, I could still not find it. I don't use enough of Google. |