![]() |
|
How to close Open TCP Connections using Proxo - Printable Version +- The Un-Official Proxomitron Forum (https://www.prxbx.com/forums) +-- Forum: Forum Related (/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Forum: Proxomitron Program (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: How to close Open TCP Connections using Proxo (/showthread.php?tid=129) |
- ProxRocks - Jul. 20, 2004 10:40 AM JakBeNymble Wrote:New incarnation:Hmm, should I be using this new reincarnation of JakBeNymble's 'close all'? Or stick with his "original" 'close all': Code: In = TRUEMy hunch is to stick with the "original"... - garcot - Jul. 20, 2004 10:56 AM JakBeNymble Wrote:Hi "Guyz",Hi Jak, Thanks for your query. You are right when you are using remote proxy. I don't use them, as they tend to slow down the connection speed. I don't find any difference in speed of closing open connections with or without "Persistent connection" set to small numeric value. Regards Garcot - JakBeNymble - Jul. 20, 2004 11:00 AM "Alto-Sax" taught Me that simplicity was always the best, . . .works for me. But it's always nice to play around with filters and see if improvements can be made. Like some script-writers like to use the "*" to capture everything, but I've learned that for Me, If I just leave the match line "blank" the filter works faster. Just My two "dracmas", . . . ![]() Take Care & Best Wishes, "Happy-Jak" =:-) - garcot - Jul. 20, 2004 11:01 AM ProxRocks Wrote:Hi ProxRocks,JakBeNymble Wrote:New incarnation:Hmm, should I be using this new reincarnation of JakBeNymble's 'close all'? I am curious to know, whether this modified filter helped you to close the open connections faster? Thanks Garcot - JakBeNymble - Jul. 20, 2004 11:30 AM If You are on a dial-up connection it would be best not use the Connection filter. Using it makes You "appear" to be using a Remote Proxy, but it can slow You down to a "crawl". Best Wishes and Have just the Best Day ever, "JaK" =:-) - sidki3003 - Jul. 20, 2004 11:35 AM Do you guys know that this filter is part of Scott's default config since Naoko 4.0? ![]() Code: [HTTP headers]sidki - ProxRocks - Jul. 20, 2004 12:34 PM Nope, did not know that... I never used Scott's default config... garcot, have no clue... Not only did I not see the need to switch from the 'close all' already present in my config, but I'm afraid I wouldn't know HOW to test which one closes them faster... As long as they are closed, that works for me... - Kye-U - Jul. 21, 2004 12:18 AM This filter causes problems when I try to post a message or attachment. - JakBeNymble - Jul. 21, 2004 12:38 AM Thank You "Sidki3003" for pointing that out. I believe in giving credit where credits due. Like the "batch file" in the last "Jakxpack" was named after "SHea" who worked out the problem using it on win98x. And certainly "Scott" deserves all the credit due him for all the work he did. Once again, "thank You My Good Friend". I had worked on this filter back over at "Arne's". I discovered that when using a remote proxy, the connections are closed, but some checker-sites, knew that I was using a browser faking a Proxy because the connections stayed open. "HpGuru" posted that it was not that big of a problem, because if an "Admin" really wanted to track You down, that there were other ways that it could be done. :o And also it can slow surfin' down to a crawl. So I decided to "disable the filter". but it was still posted where anyone could copy & pasted it in their defaults. I hadn't thought much about it since then. Best Wishes, "Jak"
- sidki3003 - Jul. 21, 2004 12:49 AM Hey Jak, i always love to look at your filters, and your JakXPack is awesome!
- JakBeNymble - Jul. 21, 2004 01:05 AM Thank You "Sidki3003" You blew Me away with that last filter-Set of Yours. It's the most elaborate Filter-Set that I've have ever seen. I think that "Scott" would have been proud of You for it, . . .I know that I am. ![]() Best Wishes, "Jak" =:-) - Oddysey - Jul. 22, 2004 06:20 PM It's getting kinda Saccharin-y around here! While searching the net for an exact definition of Max-yadda-yadda, I found this tip on one of the forums: add additional MaxConnections to your registry like so: MaxConnectionsPer2_0Server = [your favorite number here] Keep doing that up to 9_0. For once, I have no idea what is being accomplished here. (I realize that its a shock to some of you, seeing me admit to a lack of knowledge, but you're all young - you'll bounce back. Trust me. <_<) FWIW, I found that enabling or disabling the Kill Connections filter in Scott's default set, or using the modified sidki version has no effect on my surfing speed. I'm on a fractional T1, so your mileage may vary. Adding the above suggestion has also had no effect (so far), but I'll report back in a few days with my impressions of any improvements/deleterious effects. Kye-U, I too thought that it looked like "Why would I kill a connection, before it's even done its job?" OTOH, I asked myself, "Why would Scott write a filter to do this very thing, if it was gonna cause people to go 'WTF'?" Ergo, it should work as advertised, but like I said, I don't see any difference. Yet. Oddysey - ProxRocks - Jul. 22, 2004 06:49 PM All right - that's the last straw... WTF does "FWIW"mean? - Kye-U - Jul. 22, 2004 06:53 PM For What It's Worth http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/acron.html - sidki3003 - Jul. 22, 2004 07:16 PM Or ".acr/fwiw" ![]() Quote:ProxRocks lol... |